A proposed large-scale stadium development at Bath Recreation Ground has sparked significant controversy, citing concerns over its environmental impact, harm to Bath’s heritage, and the reduction of public open space.
The proposed stadium, which includes extensive commercial facilities and is designed to host large-scale events, would fundamentally alter the character of Bath, a UNESCO World Heritage site. The development would introduce a modern, oversized structure into a historically sensitive area, significantly impacting key views, the city’s conservation area, and the quality of life for residents.
Leader of the Greens on BaNES Council and councillor for Lambridge, Joanna Wright, adds:
“Again, the centre of Bath that was given to the city for public use is under threat from Bath Rugby, who want to build a massive stadium that is overdevelopment and a threat to the historic centre, the Green Party object wholeheartedly to this development.”
BathNES Greens have outlined several critical objections to the development:
- Heritage Damage: The scale and design of the proposed stadium are deemed disproportionate for the location. The project threatens to harm key views of Bath’s historic city centre and surrounding green hills, essential elements of its UNESCO World Heritage status. The development would also negatively impact several listed buildings and the Bath Conservation Area.
- Loss of Public Green Space: The project would permanently eliminate valuable public recreational space, reducing Bath’s already limited supply of parks and green areas. The stadium’s privately controlled nature would make it less accessible to the general public, undermining the original community purpose of the Recreation Ground.
- Excessive Commercialisation: The proposal includes much commercial space unrelated to the stadium’s primary purpose. This excessive commercial focus detracts from the stadium’s role as a sporting facility and prioritises profit over community benefits. Additionally, hosting major events like concerts and tournaments would disrupt the quiet, residential nature of the surrounding area.
- Noise and Pollution: The development poses significant risks of noise pollution, particularly from amplified music and large crowds, which would negatively affect nearby residents. The proposal does not adequately address noise concerns, especially for those living in historic, sound-sensitive buildings.
- Environmental and Transport Failures: The proposed development lacks a sufficient strategy for reducing car use. Bath Greens are concerned that the absence of rail connections and reliance on cars will worsen traffic congestion, increased pollution, and higher carbon emissions. The inadequate travel plan also fails to promote sustainable transport options like walking, cycling, and public transport.
- Flood Risk and Safety: Concerns have been raised about the site’s vulnerability to flooding. The current Flood Risk Assessment fails to meet necessary standards, and the development lacks adequate safe refuge areas for people in the event of flooding, posing a significant safety risk.
Opponents are calling for the rejection of the proposed stadium development, arguing that its scale, design, and environmental impact make it incompatible with Bath’s unique heritage and climate goals. The loss of public space, increased pollution, and harm to the city’s World Heritage status are far greater concerns than any potential benefits. Bath Greens believe future developments should prioritise the preservation of Bath’s character, sustainable transport, and the well-being of residents.
Greens are committed to protecting Bath’s environment, heritage, and the well-being of local residents. Their objections to the proposed stadium development at Bath Recreation Ground reflect concerns about the project’s negative impact on Bath’s UNESCO World Heritage status, public green spaces, and local sustainability goals.
The proposed stadium development threatens to irreversibly alter the character of Bath, undermining its status as a UNESCO World Heritage site. Greens are calling for a rejection of the plans, urging a focus on preserving the city’s cultural heritage and ensuring future developments are environmentally sustainable and community-focused.
Subscribe to our Substack and receive news directly to your inbox, or the Substack app